• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

FYI Employee Background Screening

Faster, Smarter, Easier Employee Screening

Header Right

  • About
  • Solutions
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Login

800.809.2419

Best Practices For Employee Screening

Possible Amendment to Fair Credit Reporting Act – Ban Employers’ Use of Credit Checks

May 10, 2010 By Chris Miller

IMG_1834

Seyfarth Shaw LLP, one of America’s leading full-service law firms, reported Senator Dianne Feinstein of California recently introduced SA 3795 as an amendment to the  Fair Credit Reporting Act.

“Senator Feinstein’s bill proposes to restrict an employer from using a “consumer’s creditworthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity” in making any employment decision or for the basis of taking any adverse action—regardless of whether a consumer gives an employer consent to use such information.

The only exceptions to this prohibition would be for:

1) national security or FDIC clearance;

2) employment with state or local government agency which requires the use of this information;

3) employment in a management position with access to customer funds at a financial institution; or

4) as otherwise required by law.”

Read More

Photo Credit: TheTruthAbout…

Filed Under: 2010 Best Employee Screening Posts, 2011 Best Employee Screening Posts, Best Practices For Employee Screening, employment background checks, Legal Compliance Tagged With: Add new tag, Credit Reports

Another State Restricts Use of Credit Reports in Employee Background Screening

March 31, 2010 By Chris Miller

money_hand

On March 29, 2010, Oregon Governor Kulongoski signed legislation (S.B. 1045) that specifically prohibits employers from using credit history in making hiring, discharge, promotion, and compensation decisions unless the applicant or employee is given advanced written notice and the credit history is substantially job-related. Although the proposed legislation was to be effective July 1, 2010, the Governor declared the legislation effective immediately.

Oregon joins Washington and Hawaii as one of three states that have effectively banned workplace credit checks. There is also pending legislation in Illinois that recently passed the House of Representatives, which would impose similar restrictions. This trend underscores the importance of employers being aware of state law restrictions pertaining to credit and background checks,  particularly in multistate businesses.

There are four exceptions to the Oregon law:

  1. Bank and credit union employers
  2. Employers that are required by state and federal law to use credit histories for employment purposes
  3. Public safety officer employers
  4. Employers that can demonstrate that credit information is “substantially job-related” and that provide written disclosure of the reasons for the use of the credit check

The statute does not further define what “substantially job-related” means, nor has the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) adopted rules to inform employers on how it will be applied.

In the absence of clear rules or guidance from BOLI, employers that intend to continue utilizing credit histories after March 29th, 2010, should proceed with caution and consult legal counsel to determine whether they fit into one of the statute’s exceptions. If they do not fit within an exception, employers should develop alternatives to current practices to avoid penalties and civil liability. A violation of the new law is an unlawful employment practice, and an aggrieved individual can file a complaint with BOLI and a civil lawsuit for injunctive relief, reinstatement or back pay, and attorney’s fees.

Compliance steps for Oregon Employers:

  • Do not run credit reports for employees or applicants, unless your company fits into one of the four exceptions.
  • Seek counsel to determine if credit information is “substantially job-related.”
  • You can still run other types of background checks (criminal record searches, employment and education verifications, etc.) as you did before this law.

Sources:  Seyfarth Shaw, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Photo credit: Neubie

Filed Under: 2010 Best Employee Screening Posts, 2011 Best Employee Screening Posts, Best Practices For Employee Screening, Job Search, Legal Compliance Tagged With: Credit Reports, Legal Compliance

NH Courts to Close As Furloughs Hit Judicial System

March 16, 2010 By Chris Miller

courthouse

In order to meet a budget shortfall of 3.1 million dollars, the New Hampshire Judicial Branch announced that all New Hampshire courts and judicial branch administrative offices will be closed on the following days:

  • Friday April 2, 2010
  • Friday April 30, 2010
  • Friday May 28, 2010

Read more about the court furloughs (pdf).

Photo credit: Zoom Zoom

Filed Under: 2010 Best Employee Screening Posts, 2011 Best Employee Screening Posts, Best Practices For Employee Screening, employment background checks, Legal Compliance Tagged With: Legal Compliance

Legislative Alert – Maryland HB175 Seeks to Limit Use of Credit Reports by Employers

February 3, 2010 By Chris Miller

We just received this alert from The National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS).

Maryland HB175 Seeks to Limit Use of Credit Reports by Employers

Maryland House Bill 175 would prohibit an employer from using an applicant’s or employee’s credit report or credit history in determining whether to deny employment to the applicant, discharge the employee or determine compensation or terms, conditions, or privileges employment; authorizing an employer to request or consider an applicant’s credit report or credit history under specified circumstances; authorizing an applicant or employee to bring an action for injunctive relief, damages, or other relief for a violation of a specified provision of law; etc.

We urge you to participate in this action alert to communicate the impact this will have on employers in Maryland and on companies providing background screening services both in Maryland and nationally.

Here is the letter that we’ve sent:

Dereck Davis, Chairman,   House Economic Matters Committee

Re:  MD House Bill 175

I am writing in opposition to House Bill 175 – Credit Reports and Credit Histories of Applicants and Employees.  This bill, if enacted, would effectively prohibit employers from utilizing credit history in hiring prospective employees.

We are a member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) which represents over 700 members and their respective companies.  Our company is a national provider of background check and credential verification information for employers. Our clients are representative of the more than 88% of companies in the US who perform background checks on their employees across the country.  Our information products protect employers from liability and ensure that newly hired employees pose no financial risk.

Credit reports are integral to the hiring process because employers must determine the accuracy and completeness of a job application. Credit reports are used for employment checks to show former addresses, former employment, and the financial situation of a prospective employee. By using credit reports in the hiring process, employers avoid wasting resources on recruiting, hiring, and training new employees, only to find out later that the hiring decision was based on incomplete or falsified information. Also, employers use credit reports to safeguard against internal theft that can be a result of employees who can not meet their monthly financial obligations.

The use of credit reports for employment decisions is governed and expressly allowed by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Under the FCRA, an employer must give the consumer notice that a credit report may be used in the hiring process and require the consumer’s written consent to access their credit report. The FCRA provides important consumer protections by requiring a notice by the employer if an adverse action is taken; i.e. the applicant is not hired. The notice includes the name, address, and phone number of the consumer reporting agency or credit reporting agency that supplied the report.  Additionally, under existing federal law, potential employees already receive certain protections relating to employer consideration of prior bankruptcy filings.

It is our hope that Maryland employers will be allowed the continued use of credit reports for hiring decisions.  If you have any questions concerning how credit reports are used by employers to make decisions, please feel free to contact me.   Thank you for your time and consideration of our views.

Sincerely,

Chris Miller

President

FYI Screening, Inc.

Filed Under: 2010 Best Employee Screening Posts, 2011 Best Employee Screening Posts, Best Practices For Employee Screening, Employee Screening, Legal Compliance Tagged With: Credit Reports, FCRA, Legal Compliance

Best Employee Screening Articles For October & November 2009

December 2, 2009 By Chris Miller

In case you missed any of our employee screening articles for October and November, here’s a quick recap of our most popular:

  • Florida Lawmakers Pledge Changes To Their Background Screening Program
  • Sex Offender Safety Tips
  • No Background Check? No Problem – Cracking Down On The Gun Show Loophole
  • How A Woman Falsified Her Nursing Credentials For 18 Years
  • University Removes New-Hire DNA Testing From It’s Background Check Policy
  • Genes and Jobs: Can Employers Use Your DNA For A Background Check?
  • 100% Of Companies Will Be Using Social Networks As Part Of Their Employee Screening Program By 2012
  • How To Protect Your Company When Googling Job Applicants

Smart, Compliant Hiring Decisions Made Easy

FYI Screening offers a wide array of customized background screening solutions to meet any need. Human Resources and Loss Prevention Professionals in numerous industries worldwide trust FYI’s screening solutions every day to make smarter, safer and more cost effective hiring decisions.

  • Subscribe to our blog to stay informed
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Connect on LinkedIn

Filed Under: 2010 Best Employee Screening Posts, 2011 Best Employee Screening Posts, Background Checks, Best Practices For Employee Screening, Employee Screening, Employee Screening Tips, Job Search, Legal Compliance, Negligent Hiring, Negligent Retention, Privacy, Sex Offenders, Social Networks Tagged With: Background Check, Best Practices For Employee Screening, Education Background Checks, Legal Compliance, Negligent Hiring, Negligent Hiring Lawsuits, Negligent Retention, Privacy, Sex Offenders, Social Networks

  • « Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • …
  • Page 12
  • Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • 5 Reasons To Love Background Checks
  • Happy Independence Day!
  • 4 Great Reasons To Use FYI Screening For Your Background Checks
  • Happy Holidays from FYI Screening!
  • Happy Halloween from FYI Screening!

Testimonials

“I have been associated with FYI for more than six years. I have used a number of other agencies to do our background investigations and have never had any of them that approaches the quality I receive from FYI. They deliver a quality product in a timely manner that is quick and accurate, without fail. I would add that FYI’s service is a value added component of our comprehensive Loss Prevention Product. We highly recommend FYI.”

Director of Loss Prevention – One of the largest convenience store chains in the United States

Copyright © 2022 · FYI Screening · 800.809.2419 · Compliance